R. v Burns case Breif
Date Submitted: 07/18/2004 10:57:06
Case Facts The defendants Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif Ahmad Rafay were accused to have committed aggravated first degree murder in Washington State. In a confession to an undercover RCMP officer in British Columbia, posing as a mob boss, it is clamed that Burns was a contract killer hired by Rafay to kill his parents so that Rafay could get insurance money for their deaths. It is claimed that Burns beat the victims with a
Is this Essay helpful? Join now to read this particular paper
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
and access over 480,000 just like this GET BETTER GRADES
has allowed for a change to the Ministers application of extradition without assurances. They said that the basic tenets of our legal system have not changed, but given Canada's attitude towards the death penalty in the time between Kindler and this case, the tilt of extradition without assurances in Kindler being considered constitutional, has now tilted on the other side and is now unconstitutional under s.7 of the charter, therefore the Ministers appeal was dismissed.
Need a custom written paper? Let our professional writers save your time.