Explain if the League's actions in Corfu and Bulgaria diminished or improved the League's reputation.

The League of Nations was established as an organisation that would bring peace and harmony to the world, and historians have had mixed views on their success in that respect when looking back on the League's achievements. It is universally agreed that the League's golden era were the 1920's, during which some of their greatest accomplishments occurred, both in terms of war-prevention and disease, refugee, and slave related issues. During the 20's, the League relocated 3 …

…by proving that they were effective despite their shortcomings, and their structure and methods of resolution were also effective. However, it also diminished their reputation by showing the world that the League was, in essence, a bully, and that the members were selfish. There are both pros and cons to the League's involvement in solving the two disputes, but the main point still remains that war was successfully averted because of the League of Nations.